Re: string function - "format" function proposal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26848.1283783048@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: string function - "format" function proposal (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: string function - "format" function proposal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> No, you need to use the I/O functions. Not every type is guaranteed to >> have a cast to text. > One issue is that Pavel want to generate valid SQL statement using > %v format. Boolean values are printed as t or f, so the unquoted > values are not valid syntax. So? You'd need to quote the values anyway, in general. If you want something that will be valid SQL you'd better include the functionality of quote_literal() in it. > If we only use output functions, boolean values should be written as > 't' or 'f' (single-quoted), Only numeric values can be unquoted on %v. I'm not sure that it's a good idea to have any type-specific special cases. Failing to quote numeric values will bring in the whole set of issues about how the parser initially types numeric constants, as in the other thread over the weekend. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: