Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26841.1455808669@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Relaxing SSL key permission checks (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes: > Currently the server insists on ssl_key_file's permissions to be 0600 > or less, and be owned by the database user. Debian has been patching > be-secure.c since forever (the git history goes back to 8.2beta1) to > relax that to 0640 or less, and owned by root or the database user. Debian can do that if they like, but it's entirely unacceptable as an across-the-board patch. Not all systems treat groups as being narrow domains in which it's okay to assume that group-readable files are secure enough to be keys. As an example, on OS X user files tend to be group "staff" or "admin" which'd be close enough to world readable. We could allow group-readable if we had some way to know whether to trust the specific group, but I don't think there's any practical way to do that. System conventions vary too much. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: