Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26831.1201459049@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com> writes: >>> Maybe a GUC variable to enable/disable syncscan? > If so, it seems like a good idea even if it's just for debugging purposes. Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to mind is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON). Also, does anyone object to making pg_dump just disable it unconditionally? Greg's original gripe only mentioned the case of clustered tables, but it'd be kind of a pain to make pg_dump turn it on and off again for different tables. And I could see people complaining about pg_dump failing to preserve row order even in unclustered tables. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: