Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Lakhin
Тема Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes
Дата
Msg-id 2678d2b3-279e-aed8-df20-333fe838f930@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
31.03.2023 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> See also the thread about bug #16329 [1].  Alexander promised to look
> into improving the test coverage in this area, maybe he can keep an
> eye on the WAL logic coverage too.

Yes, I'm going to analyze that area too. Maybe it'll take more time
(a week or two) if I encounter some bugs there (for now I observe anomalies
with gist__int_ops), but I will definitely try to improve the gist testing.

Best regards,
Alexander

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete()
Следующее
От: Melanie Plageman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often