Re: starting out
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: starting out |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26755.1044985398@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: starting out (Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Phil Howard <phil-pgsql-general@ipal.net> writes: > Well, this isn't exactly what I wanted, but it gets me rolling and > confirms I pinpointed the problem in OpenSSL. I really want it to > reference the major version number. But that is version 0, not 2 > as Redhat seems to have. [looks at rpm specfile...] No, the reason Red Hat is using 2 is that the openssl boys have repeatedly broken binary compatibility without incrementing their major version number as they ought. At the moment I find in the Rawhide version # For the curious: # 0.9.5a soversion = 0 # 0.9.6 soversion = 1 # 0.9.6a soversion = 2 # 0.9.6c soversion = 3 # 0.9.7 soversion = 4 %define soversion 4 If you are concerned about making the .so version number actually useful, I recommend you follow Red Hat's lead. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: