Re: elog cleanup

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Wow, what encouragement!  :-<

Well, I assumed that you generated this patch with the intention of
applying it promptly.  If it was only a basis for discussion, why'd
you go to the effort of creating a 100K+ patch that will be stale in
a few days?  It's certainly not useful to aid the discussion: a ten-line
statement of what you wanted to do would've been more helpful.  Who's
going to wade through a 100K patch?

In any case, the correct approach would've been to put up a proposal
on pghackers before doing the work.  You *know* this is going to be
controversial.  More, if it's not highlighted on pghackers then a
lot of people will fail to get the word and we'll be having trouble
with broken patches for a long time to come.

            regards, tom lane