Re: How can I avoid Frozenxid wraparound on failover to a standby(PITR) database?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How can I avoid Frozenxid wraparound on failover to a standby(PITR) database? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26690.1220633537@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How can I avoid Frozenxid wraparound on failover to a standby(PITR) database? (Arctic Toucan <arctic_toucan@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How can I avoid Frozenxid wraparound on failover to a
standby(PITR) database?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Arctic Toucan <arctic_toucan@hotmail.com> writes: > I next started looking at the age(refrozenxid) of the tables in my DB, and was surprised to see that over 4000 of the 5000tables in this DB had an age over 2Billion. So thats 4000 tables representing over a terabyte of data that need to bevacuumed! I am now vacuuming those tables one at a time, which is taking a long time(This is a scripted process). So thereis no way I could have vacuumed the tables quickly enough even given a warning of impending XID wraparound. > Looking through the support mailing lists(Bugs) I see some discussion about the frozenxid updates on the master not beingpropogated to the slave through the WAL logs, and comments from Tom, Alvaro and Heikki suggesting that they were lookinginto a solution for PG 8.3 and needed a way around the problem in PG 8.2. Hmm ... that did get fixed in 8.2 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00026.php so I'm a bit confused about what happened here. What were your autovacuum settings on the old master? Particularly autovacuum_freeze_max_age? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: