Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2663.1557409654@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:32:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Just now, while running a parallel check-world on HEAD according to the >> same script I've been using for quite some time, one of the TAP tests >> died during initdb: >> performing post-bootstrap initialization ... 2019-05-08 13:59:19.963 EDT [18351] FATAL: pre-existing shared memory block(key 5440004, ID 1734475802) is still in use > The odds are very high that you would not have gotten that error before that > commit. But if the cause matches your guess, it's not something wrong with > the commit ... Fair point. > What OS, OS version, and filesystem? Up-to-date RHEL6 (kernel 2.6.32-754.12.1.el6.x86_64), ext4 over LVM on spinning rust with an LSI MegaRAID controller in front of it. Since complaining, I've done half a dozen more parallel check-worlds without issue, so the error was and still is rare. This matches the fact that we've not seen it in the buildfarm :-(. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: