Re: backup file system
| От | Jeremy Buchmann |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: backup file system |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2646BAB0-CE5F-11D5-A44B-000502E740BA@wellsgaming.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: backup file system ("Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: backup file system
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Or, you can backup both... We backup the filesystem every night with plain old dump and then run pg_dump and copy that file onto the backup, too. Makes for some nice redundancy. --Jeremy On Tuesday, October 30, 2001, at 04:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On 30 Oct 2001 at 15:27, Leong, Fushan wrote: > >> I am working on a shell script to backup my postgres database. >> Compared >> with pg_dump and pg_dumpall, I would like to backup the file system >> instead of dump the database because I can shutdown the database >> server >> in midnight for a few hours. I also can sure I will have a stable >> backup. >> ( No user is doing anything at the same time ) > > Personally, I'd rather use pg_dump. That way I'm guaranteed to have a > file which will work with a future version of PostgreSQL. > > Why do you want to back up the file system instead of using pg_dump? > > SIDE ISSUE: A possible benefit of using pg_dump instead of backing up > the > file system: all parts of the database are excerised/explored; any bad > parts of the file system will > be identified then. > -- > Dan Langille > The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: