Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> andreas.papst@univie.ac.at wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure, it works as intended, but maybe it is useful to other
>> postgres users too to have stated in the description of
>> temp_file_limit
>> that this value effects vacuum runs too:
>> vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "test" failed: ERROR: temporary file
>> size exceeds temp_file_limit (2097152kB)
> This seems like a bug to me.
I don't know what vacuum would be doing that would involve creating
temp files at all. Seems like we need more information here.
regards, tom lane