Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26405.1183565103@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: SPI-header-files safe for C++-compiler
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > wild idea - we could add a bit of configure magic and a special makefile > target and add a buildfarm stage for that and have it automatically > check for these things ? I had been idly toying with the idea of making a tool to check for C++ problems, when it occurred to me that we already have almost the right thing: src/tools/pginclude/pgcompinclude is a script that checks that each .h file in the system can be compiled without any other preceding inclusions except postgres.h. If run with a C++ compiler instead of C, seems it would accomplish the task we want. As it stands, pgcompinclude seems to lack a number of things but they're all fixable: * hard-wired compiler name and flags * hard-wired paths * should use postgres_fe.h not postgres.h for frontend-usable include files (would need a clearer policy for which those are) * possible use of unportable idioms (not sure, needs checked) Given a cleaned-up version of pgcompinclude, we could add a buildfarm option to invoke it using a specified compiler and options. I don't think we need every buildfarm member doing that but getting a representative sample doing so would be a Good Thing. Even without considering the C++ angle, this is an area that's easy to break and having quicker feedback would be good. The current practice of manually running pgcompinclude once in awhile lacks a lot, notably coverage of different sets of compile options (see notes at the bottom of src/tools/pginclude/README). Anybody feel like working on that? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: