Re: Planning time in explain/explain analyze
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planning time in explain/explain analyze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26398.1389329124@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planning time in explain/explain analyze (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planning time in explain/explain analyze
Re: Planning time in explain/explain analyze |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> In short then, I think we should just add this to EXPLAIN and be done. >> -1 for sticking the info into PlannedStmt or anything like that. > I'm confused. I thought I was arguing to support your suggestion that > the initial planning store the time in the cached plan and explain > should output the time the original planning took. Uh, no, wasn't my suggestion. Doesn't that design imply measuring *every* planning cycle, explain or no? I was thinking more of just putting the timing calls into explain.c. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: