Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26357.1467400438@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h
Re: Broken handling of lwlocknames.h |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > Yes that would be indeed cleaner this way. I have poked a bit at that > and finished with the attached that defines some rules to generate all > the files needed. I made some mostly-cosmetic changes to this and pushed it. One thing to note is that it seemed to me you'd broken the rule for schemapg.h: by removing the phony target, I think you removed the behavior that we'd always go and recheck schemapg.h's dependencies. To do it correctly without that target, we'd need src/backend/Makefile to know all of those dependencies, duplicating the rather long list in catalog/Makefile. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: