Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2631427.1712451236@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
So what was really bothering me about this patchset was that I didn't think marginal performance gains were a sufficient reason to put a whole different operating mode into libpq. However, I've reconsidered after realizing that implementing FETCH_COUNT atop traditional single-row mode would require either merging single-row results into a bigger PGresult or persuading psql's results-printing code to accept an array of PGresults not just one. Either of those would be expensive and ugly, not to mention needing chunks of code we don't have today. Also, it doesn't really need to be a whole different operating mode. There's no reason that single-row mode shouldn't be exactly equivalent to chunk mode with chunk size 1, except for the result status code. (We've got to keep PGRES_SINGLE_TUPLE for the old behavior, but using that for a chunked result would be too confusing.) So I whacked the patch around till I liked it better, and pushed it. I hope my haste will not come back to bite me, but we are getting pretty hard up against the feature-freeze deadline. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: