Re: DatabaseMetaData and Transactions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DatabaseMetaData and Transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26296.1118199561@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DatabaseMetaData and Transactions (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DatabaseMetaData and Transactions
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> writes: > You're going to have to pass metadata down, or change your queries to > explicitly cast the parameters in the SQL itself. The driver has exactly > the same problem as your code does -- with the v3 protocol it needs to > provide a type for the parameter, but if it's just provided as a string > the only type it can assume is text.. Is there any chance of a win in passing the type across to the backend as "unknown", and seeing if the backend can infer something reasonable? For example given WHERE int4col = ? it'd be reasonable to infer the type of the ? symbol as int4, and that logic has been built into the backend since forever. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: