Re: UNION Types Mismatch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UNION Types Mismatch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26251.1051107320@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | UNION Types Mismatch ("CN" <cnliou9@fastmail.fm>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"CN" <cnliou9@fastmail.fm> writes: > SELECT c1 AS a,NULL AS b,NULL AS c FROM ta > UNION ALL > SELECT NULL,c1,NULL FROM tb > UNION ALL > SELECT NULL,NULL,c1 FROM tc; > ERROR: UNION types 'text' and 'smallint' not matched Yeah. The problem basically is that you have (null UNION null) UNION smallint and the inner union type gets resolved to text by default. I have a TODO note about this that questions whether we can improve the behavior without violating spec. Consider (numeric UNION numeric) UNION float8 Presently this will be performed as a numeric UNION, then cast the output to float8 and do a float8 UNION. The datatype is a critical part of the semantics because it determines what will be considered duplicate values. If we chose a common datatype across all three union arms to start with, it'd be float8, and we'd possibly get a different result from the query. It may be that the spec will let us get away with doing it anyway, but some close study is needed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: