Re: PreparedStatement error for date parameter with overlaps
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PreparedStatement error for date parameter with overlaps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26246.1306851022@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PreparedStatement error for date parameter with overlaps (Simon Mitchell <simon@jseb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PreparedStatement error for date parameter with overlaps
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Simon Mitchell <simon@jseb.com> writes: > So from what I understand using the date function in jdbc stuff requires > brackets like most functions do, > but the psql is happy for me to use the date function with or without > brackets. Craig Ringer already posted a much more long-winded response, but the short answer is that this syntax is *not* a function. The SQL spec defines type_name 'literal string' as a way of writing a literal constant of a specific type. (The spec actually only seems to allow this for certain type names, but Postgres extends that to allow any known type name to be used.) This is not a function and it doesn't work for any case except where the second part is a quoted literal string. Personally I think it's a wart best avoided, but we're stuck with supporting it because of the standard. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: