Re: Sparc v Intel
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sparc v Intel |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26220.1007439160@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Sparc v Intel (andrew.clark@sge.net) |
Ответы |
Re: Sparc v Intel
|
Список | pgsql-general |
andrew.clark@sge.net writes: > I'm trying to find some hard data comparing PostgreSQL on Intel and Sparc > platforms. Does anyone know where I can find data like this? Have an view > on the subject? Does a 64 bit architecture make any difference with a > small database? Large databases? If so how large? Think I/O, not CPU. Big-iron Sparc boxes will probably have lots better I/O than PC-grade hardware, and that translates directly to database performance. Which is not to say that you can't buy big-iron platforms with Intel CPUs in 'em. But they're not consumer PCs. Be careful to compare apples to apples. As far as 32bit vs 64bit, my feeling is that the only immediate benefit of 64bit is that you could load the thing with more than 4GB of RAM and have *lots* of kernel disk buffers. This could be a serious win if your database is large enough that the active page set exceeds 4GB. Further out, we've speculated off and on about converting int8 and float8 to pass-by-value datatypes on machines where Datum is 8 bytes. That should make for a nice performance improvement on operations using those datatypes. But it's not done yet and the actual benefit is hard to guess. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: