Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods
От | Nikolay Shaplov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binaryreloptions representation for each relation kind instead (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
В Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:24:49 +0900 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> пишет: > > Looks like some good actionable feedback. I've moved this patch to > > September, and set it to "Waiting on Author". > > The patch is in this state for two months now, so I have switched it > to "returned with feedback". The latest patch does not apply, and it > would require an update for the new test module dummy_index_am. I've been thinking about this patch and came to a conclusion that it would be better to split it to even smaller parts, so they can be easily reviewed, one by one. May be even leaving most complex Heap/Toast part for later. This is first part of this patch. Here we give each Access Method it's own option binary representation instead of StdRdOptions. I think this change is obvious. Because, first, Access Methods do not use most of the values defined in StdRdOptions. Second this patch make Options structure code unified for all core Access Methods. Before some AM used StdRdOptions, some AM used it's own structure, now all AM uses own structures and code is written in the same style, so it would be more easy to update it in future. John Dent, would you join reviewing this part of the patch? I hope it will be more easy now... -- Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing (Russian)
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: