Re: More WITH
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: More WITH |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26180.1439833266@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: More WITH (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: More WITH
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Would be tricky. We don't currently have any way to wrap an EXPLAIN in >> any larger statement, do we? Would be very useful for automated query >> analysis, though. > No. In the grammar, ExplainStmt expects the EXPLAIN to be at the > top-level. Having it work any other way would require significant > refactoring. You can use EXPLAIN as the source of rows in a plpgsql FOR-over-query loop, so there's a workaround available that way when you need to read EXPLAIN output programmatically. I'm not convinced there's sufficient value in trying to make EXPLAIN a full-fledged subquery otherwise. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: