Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26178.1329319082@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment? (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:40, dennis jenkins > <dennis.jenkins.75@gmail.com> wrote: >> I recently updated my Gentoo Linux development system from postgresql >> 9.0.4 to 9.0.6-r1 (9.0.6 plus some Gentoo specific patches). �One of >> my 'C' language functions (been using it for years) stopped working >> because the backend no longer had access to the PGDATA environment >> variable. �A snippet of code is included below. > I suggest you look at the version history of the gentoo packaging and > scripts instead. My guess is that something was changed there. Yes. A PG backend will not remove a "PGDATA" envar, but *it does not set it either*. This sounds to me like a change in the startup script. > You can look at the configuration variable data_directory, or use the > C symbol DataDir which is exported from the backend. Quite --- at the C level, looking at DataDir is the right thing, and looking at PGDATA could be misleading even if it exists --- consider the possibility that we took the data_directory setting from the command line or postgresql.conf. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: