Re: Win32 Thread safetyness
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 Thread safetyness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26151.1125256952@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 Thread safetyness (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 Thread safetyness
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Also, there doesn't seem to be a good way for users to know >>> if libpq or ecpg was compiled to be thread-safe. >> >> Right. A runtime function for this might be a good thing? Like "bool >> PQisThreadSafe()" or such? > Yes, and a flag to ecpg. Added to TODO: Um, it's not clear *when* you need to know this:- application configure time?- application compile time?- application linktime?- application run time? Of those possibilities, "add a function" responds to only one, and it's the one I can see least use-case for. I should think that by run-time it's probably too late to do much about it other than fail. You can find out whether thread-safety was mentioned in our configure settings by looking at the result of pg_config --configure. This might be enough for the find-out-at-configure-time case. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: