Re: Could not open relation with OID (table partitioning issue?)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could not open relation with OID (table partitioning issue?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26145.1290438586@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could not open relation with OID (table partitioning issue?) ("mark" <dvlhntr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could not open relation with OID (table partitioning issue?)
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
"mark" <dvlhntr@gmail.com> writes: > I don't know if this is a bug and if so, if it fixed in the most current > patch. (I don't see anything in the release notes that make think so though > however). At least one reason for this type of problem was fixed in 8.4. commit d4a363cdf2b426bbf6c401543b8286ad86ca9bd5 Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue May 12 03:11:02 2009 +0000 Modify find_inheritance_children() and find_all_inheritors() to add the ability to lock relations as they scan pg_inherits, and to ignore any relations that have disappeared by the time we get lock on them. This makes uses of these functions safe against concurrent DROP operations on child tables: we will effectively ignore any just-dropped child, rather than possibly throwing an error as in recent bug report from Thomas Johansson (and similar past complaints). The behavior should not change otherwise, since the code was acquiring those same locks anyway, just a little bit later. An exception is LockTableCommand(), which is still behaving unsafely; but that seems to require some more discussion before we change it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: