Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
От | Denis Laxalde |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2612cb81-2a8b-be11-6f77-97801ea6a3ad@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:06:27PM +0200, Denis Laxalde wrote: >> Thank you; this V2 looks good to me. >> Marking as ready for committer. > > Please note that we are in a stabilization period for v16 and that the > first commit fest of v17 should start in July, so it will perhaps take > some time before this is looked at by a committer. Yes, I am aware; totally fine by me. > Speaking of which, what was the performance impact of your application > once PQflush() was moved out of the pipeline sync? Just asking for > curiosity.. I have no metrics for that; but maybe Anton has some? (In Psycopg, we generally do not expect users to handle the sync operation themselves, it's done under the hood; and I only found one situation where the flush could be avoided, but that's largely because our design, there can be more in general I think.)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: