Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26121.1296757951@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >>> I have reviewed is_absolute_path() and have implemented >>> path_is_relative_and_below_cwd() to cleanly handle cases like 'E:abc' on >>> Win32; patch attached. >> >> This patch appears to remove some security-critical restrictions. >> Why did you delete the path_contains_parent_reference calls? > They are now in path_is_relative_and_below_cwd(), ... and thus not invoked in the absolute-path case. This is a security hole. > I don't see a general reason to prevent > ".." in absolute paths, only relative ones. load '/path/to/database/../../../path/to/anywhere' regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: