Re: Allow peer/ident to fall back to md5?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow peer/ident to fall back to md5? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26114.1414550715@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Allow peer/ident to fall back to md5? (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow peer/ident to fall back to md5?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > At pgconf-eu �lvaro and I were discussing the idea of allowing 'peer' > and 'ident' authentication to fall back to md5 if the peer/ident check > failed. I think it would be acceptable to define *new* auth modes that work that way. I'm violently against redefining the meaning of existing pg_hba.conf entries like this: it's not terribly hard to imagine cases where it'd be a security problem, and even if you claim it isn't, people will get bent out of shape if they think you're poking holes in their oh-so-carefully-chosen authentication arrangements. > If anyone's concerned about that I think it'd be reasonable to > add an option in pg_hba.conf to allow 'ident' and 'peer' to be qualified > with a no_md5_fallback mode. You've got that exactly backwards. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: