Re: disabling log_rotation_age feature.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disabling log_rotation_age feature. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26093.1402588800@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disabling log_rotation_age feature. (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: disabling log_rotation_age feature.
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane-2 [via PostgreSQL] < > ml-node+s1045698n5807014h58@n5.nabble.com> wrote: >> I wonder if we should round fractions up instead of down in that logic? >> It might be less surprising for those GUCs where zero is special, and >> it seems like about a wash for most others. > I think documenting the behavior better, I don't. If you have to explain it, it probably needs improvement. > Green field maybe I'd say yes but given that the new behavior could turn > features on that are currently off it doesn't seem to be beneficial enough > to warrant changing. I don't think that argument holds water either. We routinely make changes that break old postgresql.conf files. Not in minor updates of course, but none of this is material for back-patching. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: