Re: gcc: why optimize for size flag is not the default
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: gcc: why optimize for size flag is not the default |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26016.1236775361@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: gcc: why optimize for size flag is not the default (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: gcc: why optimize for size flag is not the default
Re: gcc: why optimize for size flag is not the default |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Nikhil Sontakke wrote: >> I was wondering why -Os is not used in place of -O2 while compiling the >> Postgres sources with gcc. > There's no free lunch. In any case, this sort of choice is generally something that ought to be applied at a distro level. If, say, Fedora or Debian chose to use -Os uniformly across all their packages, then there might be a meaningful amount of space saved in the aggregate. As far as I know, though, -Os is not the preferred choice in any distro, which ought to tell you something ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: