Re: bug in windows xp
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bug in windows xp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26003.1145457948@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bug in windows xp (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > Well, depends how you look at it. The original bug report was about a > backend crash, which is what happens if you don't catch the SIGFPE. Can > we guarentee that we know every situation that might generate a SIGFPE? The point here is that under Windows int4div seems to be generating something other than a SIGFPE --- if it were actually generating that particular signal then the existing SIGFPE catcher would catch it. It's barely possible that int4div *is* generating a SIGFPE and there's some other breakage preventing FloatExceptionHandler from catching it, but that's a question that deserves a one-shot test, not permanent memorialization in a regression test. Besides, if that's the situation then testing that the handler catches kill(SIGFPE) proves exactly zero about what the int4div problem is. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: