Re: Retiring legacyurls
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Retiring legacyurls |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25bb23df-db24-26f9-242c-d52281a9d5c1@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Retiring legacyurls (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Retiring legacyurls
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Hi, On 10/11/18 5:56 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:45 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net > <mailto:magnus@hagander.net>> wrote: > > We have a piece of code in legacyurls.py in the website project that > handles URLs that are from the old website. And by old website I > don't mean the one from half a year ago, I mean the one from 10 > years ago. > > This one handles: > /about/press/presskit/<ver>.html.<language> This one gave me momentary panic as we are a week away from the release and I just assembled the presskit, but then I noticed that this does not follow the current format at all, hence the whole "legacy" bit, so as long as it does not break the release work, +1 for dropping. > /about/license -> /about/licence > > Of those I suggest we keep the license redirect (some people > consider American English not to be legacy after all), but nuke the > rest. +1 to keeping this; I've seen people linking to the US spelling of this. > > Thoughts? Any of them worthy of saving? Or does somebody actually > think it's worth investing the work to track exactly how much that > old stuff is used? > > > Nah - drop 'em all. *Drop them all except the /about/license Thanks for reviewing all of this! Jonathan
Вложения
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: