Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25D72E41-9ED2-4EED-B18E-E7979E031DDB@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser (Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 14 Apr 2022, at 09:42, Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > To add the ROLE clause, the originally existing --role option (corresponding to the IN ROLE clause) is changed to the --in-roleoption. Would this not be good from a backward compatibility standpoint? - printf(_(" -g, --role=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n")); + printf(_(" -g, --in-role=ROLE new role will be a member of this role\n")); + printf(_(" -G, --role=ROLE this role will be a member of new role\n")); Won't this make existing scripts to behave differently after an upgrade? That seems like something we should avoid at all costs. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: