Re: Managing International Sites
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Managing International Sites |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25D486AD-4DF6-44A1-B674-201C70F0E66F@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Managing International Sites (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Managing International Sites
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi Justin, > On Nov 29, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> wrote: > > On 2017-11-29 18:50, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > <snip> >> My last point was for “If we do continue to link to the International >> sites, we should have guidelines on what content they should contain” >> similar to some other guidelines. It seems like the PostgreSQL.fr >> <http://postgresql.fr/> and some of the other actively maintained ones >> could serve as a model for setting up those guidelines. Once those >> guidelines are published, we can give the international sites a grace >> period to follow the guidelines and also have a proper evaluation >> process for bringing new sites into the fold. > > Hmmm, this kind of sounds like us wanting to be control freakish about > stuff. > > It doesn't hurt for us to have basic sanity checks (eg is the site > still online?, actively updated?, fairly accurate?). > > But be careful of the desire to impose strict *requirements* much past > that. Guidelines might be ok, but hard requirements (with no flexibility) > might be more harmful/issue-causing than otherwise. Should we go down this path, they would be similar to the community event / NPO guidelines, which are just that. They imposevery few requirements, more they are a set of recommendations to follow. Thanks, Jonathan
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: