Re: damage control mode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: damage control mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25987.1263105487@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: damage control mode (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: damage control mode
Re: damage control mode Re: damage control mode Re: damage control mode |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > ... I don't see much sense in worrying about it now; the 2 weeks between end > of CF and Beta are when we need to be cut-throat. Given that this time the > "must-have" feature is already in the tree, I think you will find people coming > around quickly to the side of pushing things out rather than fighting to get > things in. I think the other Robert's main point is that getting to beta in only two weeks is ridiculously optimistic (which I'm afraid I agree with). I believe that what he's proposing is tossing enough stuff overboard so that we can finish the January CF in much less than a month, and thereby have more time for alpha-level testing and stabilization of the tree. Now the other approach we could take is that we'll ship *something* on 7 Mar, even if it's less stable than what we've traditionally considered to be beta quality. I don't think that really helps much though; it just means we need more time in beta. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: