Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25983.1340326712@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump and dependencies and --section ... it's a mess (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 06/21/2012 07:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I didn't understand that then, and I still don't. > If something else holds a lock on the table (e.g. another CREATE INDEX) > the ALTER TABLE will block until it's done, waiting for an ACCESS > EXCLUSIVE lock. The whole method of operation of parallel restore is > that we are not supposed to start items that might be blocked by > currently running operations. Oh, I see --- Andrew Hammond's complaint involves *three* index creations on the same table (one running; a second one completed except for the ALTER TABLE CLUSTER step attached to it, which is blocked behind the running index creation; and a third blocked behind the ALTER TABLE CLUSTER). I had misread it to imply that only two indexes were enough to manifest the problem. Yeah, we should break out the ALTER TABLE CLUSTER step as a separate TOC item to fix this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: