Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25963.1108578499@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com> writes: > On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:13, Ron Mayer wrote: >> Fermilab did have contact information ("mail comments to:") at the >> bottom of the page. Fermilab's a quite highly respected organization, >> so I think this page is probably trusted by many. > Wandering about that page a bit myself, it seems most of this was > written between the 6.5 and 7.2 versions of PostgreSQL. I don't think > there's any active tendency towards misinformation, mostly it's just out > of date. Right. The question is whether we can get them to update it. The odds are that the MySQL and Oracle information is just as dated; so really the only fair way would be for them to redo the whole evaluation from scratch, which I could well believe they don't have the time for. It would be good to at least try to get them to label the page with the versions that they tested, and note that the info is now quite out of date. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: