Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View.....
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View..... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25948.1043283680@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View..... (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: To use a VIEW or not to use a View.....
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote: >> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: >>> The filter is applied only to a. So, if you really wanted the >>> c.a=3 condition to be applied for whatever reason you're out of >>> luck. >> >> FWIW, CVS tip is brighter: the condition does propagate to both relations. > Yeah. I was going to ask how hard you thought it would be to do for > this particular sort of case. I thought about the simple case of using > and realized it'd probably be reasonable in amount of work, but it seems > I don't have to think about it. :) It could still use more eyeballs looking at it. One thing I'm concerned about is whether the extra (derived) conditions lead to double-counting restrictivity and thus underestimating the number of result rows. I haven't had time to really test that, but I suspect there may be a problem. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: