Re: [PATCHES] WIP: Hierarchical Queries - stage 1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: Hierarchical Queries - stage 1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25922.1158933753@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] WIP: Hierarchical Queries - stage 1 (Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> writes: > The main problem I can see with keeping the CTEs outside the rangetable > is that according to the source, jointree nodes must currently have > RANGETBLREF nodes as leaf nodes; as I understand it, your suggestion of > maintaining the CTEs separately would involve something along the lines > of keeping a separate CTETable and creating some form of CTETBLREF node > that could be referenced within the jointree. No, what I'm thinking is that a *reference* to a CTE, from within the main query's FROM list, would create a "CTERef" RTE and then you'd have a normal RANGETBLREF node linking to that in the jointree. This solves the problem of where do you put the alias: on the RTE. What's not clear to me at this point is whether there can be multiple references in a query to the same CTE --- if there can, I suspect you must have a data structure like this. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: