Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25892.1064603158@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: initdb failure
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> Yeah, I was wondering whether you wouldn't propose dropping the newline >> consistency check. I'm not very comfortable with that, but maybe we >> should. Bruce? > I don't mind if we keep it on pure-POSIX platforms. But one of the nicer > developments on Windows in recent(?) times is that you can actually use > any kind of line separator and most programs still work correctly (with > the notable exception of Notepad). Not sure if we should make the behavior Windows-specific though. And didn't Michael report seeing the same initdb failure on Debian? That confuses me a bit --- why would there be a newline discrepancy on Debian? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: