Re: perltidy version

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> In that case, we should at least update our instructions for how to install
>> it. But that's definitely a better option than hosting our own copy.

> But surely the idea of updating the version to use should be considered
> further?  Maybe they have even improved the output ;-)  Has anyone
> looked?

+1.  We're not that far away from it being time to run pgindent/perltidy,
so now would be a good time to consider whether we like a newer version's
result better.

If we do decide to stick on the old version, then yes, improve the
pointer.

            regards, tom lane