Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25850.1021386607@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Global Variables (Was: Re: Discontent with development process
(was:Re: pgaccess - the discussion is over) )
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com> writes: > As I understood it the idea was to put the stuff, the > backends inherit from the postmaster, into a centralized > place, instead of having it spread out all over the place. > What's wrong with that? The main objection to it in my mind is that what had been private variables in specific modules now become exceedingly public. Instead of looking at "static int foo" and *knowing* that all the references are in the current file, you have to go trolling the entire backend to see who is referencing pg_globals.foo. I have not counted to see how many variables are really affected; if there's only a few then it doesn't matter much. But the people who have done this so far have all reported inserting tons of #ifdefs, which leads me to the assumption that there's a lot of 'em. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: