Re: MERGE vs REPLACE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25849.1132238470@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MERGE vs REPLACE
Re: MERGE vs REPLACE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com> writes: > OK, in this case I don't care about either MERGE or REPLACE, but for an > UPSERT which does the locking :-) This is exactly the point --- pretty much nobody has come to us and asked for a feature that does what Peter and Martijn say MERGE does. (I haven't bothered to look at the 2003 spec, I'm assuming they read it correctly.) What we *have* been asked for, over and over, is an insert-or-update feature that's not so tedious and inefficient as the savepoint-insert-rollback-update kluge. That's what we ought to be concentrating on providing. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: