Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25809.1506348877@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 09/24/2017 07:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I think we should just stop with the blacklist test for v10, >> and then see if we still get complaints (and exactly what they're >> about) so that we can judge how much more work the problem deserves. >> It's still ahead of where we were in previous releases, and ahead of >> where we'd be if we end up reverting the patch altogether. > That's pretty much what I was saying. Oh ... I did not think we were on the same page, because your patch didn't include removal of the same-transaction heuristic. It'd be sensible to do that as a separate patch, though, to make it easier to put back if we decide we do want it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: