Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [JDBC] Possible large object bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2580.985654854@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joe Shevland" <shevlandj@kpi.com.au> writes: > Semi-topical I hope ;) Completely irrelevant to JDBC as far as I can see. I've redirected to pghackers. > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/115: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > ... > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6087: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6111: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6112: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6136: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > NOTICE: Rel pg_attribute: TID 1/6137: OID IS INVALID. TUPGONE 1. > pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly. > This probably means the backend terminated abnormally > before or while processing the request. Ugh. It looks like something has clobbered your pg_attribute file. Was this the first sign of trouble? Can you provide an "od -x" dump of that file? (It'd be $PGDATA/base/DB2OID/1249; you'll need to look in pg_database to determine the OID of db2.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: