Re: [patch] test failure on sparc64 due to undefined division by zero behaviour

Martin Pitt  writes:
> The C99 standard [2], section 6.5.5 paragraph 5 actually says:

>   "The result of the / operator is the quotient from the division of
>   the first operand by the second; the result of the % operator is the
>   remainder. In both operations, if the value of the second operand is
>   zero, the behavior is undefined."

> so the gcc folk's claim that this isn't a gcc bug looks justified.

The gcc guys are full of it.  The issue that is relevant here is the C
standard's definition of sequence points, and in particular the
requirement that visible side effects of a later statement cannot happen
before the execution of an earlier function call.  The last time I
pestered them about this, I got some lame claim that a SIGFPE wasn't a
side effect within the definitions of the spec.  At that point useful
discussion stopped, because it's impossible to negotiate with someone
who's willing to claim that.

> Aurelien sent a straightforward patch for this, I updated it to apply
> to current git head, updated the comments, and git-formatted it.

Hmm ... I'm willing to put in the extra return statements, but not to
remove the comments that we're working around a gcc bug.  In particular,
given the gcc folks' claim that they need not consider the timing of
program-generated signals, there is really nothing to stop them from
trying to push the division up before the return too.  This is nothing
but a band-aid for a non-standards-compliant optimizer.

			regards, tom lane