Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25775.1287584015@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> Lets rename the directory. > Hmmm, but we call it 'xml2' in the doc. There is no 'pgxml' at all in it. > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/xml2.html > However, I don't think we can change the module name because pg_upgrade > will fail if the module (.so) name was changed. So, it might be the > point of compromise to keep two names until we deprecate it completely. If the extensions manager is dependent on the assumption that a module's name matches the name of the directory it's built in, that assumption needs to be removed anyway. There are too many use-cases where that wouldn't hold, even if we try to force the standard contrib modules to follow such a rule. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: