Re: Rejection of the smallest int8

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Rejection of the smallest int8
Дата
Msg-id 25751.1006380904@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Rejection of the smallest int8  (sugita@sra.co.jp)
Список pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Use strtoll/strtoull if available.  They should be on "most" systems
> anyway.

Mph.  The reason int8in is coded the way it is is to avoid having to
deal with strtoll configuration (does it exist?  Is it the right thing?
Don't forget Alphas, where int8 == long).  We'd still need a fallback
if it doesn't exist, so I'm not that excited about this answer.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rejection of the smallest int8
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rejection of the smallest int8