Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25723.948734983@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes: > Things are still not so good for me. The pg_dumpall > file, psql < file did > work, but later: > newnham=> select * from crsids,"tblPerson" where newnham-> crsids.crsid != "tblPerson"."CRSID"; > Backend sent B message without prior T > D21Enter data to be copied followed by a newline. > End with a backslash and a period on a line by itself. >>> > which smells like a similar problem. (Note that this is a join. Straight > selects didn't cause problems) Bizarre. Obviously, the frontend and backend have gotten out of sync, but it's not too clear who's to blame. Since you also mention > (New also, though probably unrelated: the sanity check fails with number of > index tuples exactly half number in heap - not equal) I think that you may have some subtle platform-specific problems in the backend. What exactly is your platform/compiler/configuration, anyway? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: