Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
| От | Florian Pflug |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 25698CB8-B92F-41A9-9378-891243004AF2@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan22, 2011, at 17:55 , Tom Lane wrote: > Reflecting on that, I'm inclined to suggest > > Bitmap Heap Scan ... > Recheck Cond: blah blah > Rows Removed by Recheck: 42 > Filter Cond: blah blah blah > Rows Removed by Filter: 77 > > or even more verbosely > > Bitmap Heap Scan ... > Recheck Cond: blah blah > Rows Removed by Recheck Cond: 42 > Filter Cond: blah blah blah > Rows Removed by Filter Cond: 77 > > ie repeat the label of the filtering condition exactly. This is looking > pretty long, but from the viewpoint of vertical or horizontal space > occupied by the printout, I doubt it matters. +1. Repeating the label of the condition adds enough context to make "Removed" unambiguous IMHO. best regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: