Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25643.1125006684@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support (Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@seznam.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@seznam.cz> writes: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> So, not quite there yet. > [I did make check only in W2K because I don't have direct access to XP > machine now] > No thats not windows error thats postgres error (look at pqcomm.c), > which means HAVE_IPV6 is not defined. Possibly, but that's apparently not the only problem. I'm looking at the first buildfarm result with this patch, http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2005-08-25%2018:56:02 The interesting part is the postmaster log at the bottom: LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: No error HINT: Is another postmaster already running on port 55678? If not, wait a few seconds and retry. WARNING: could not create listen socket for "localhost" FATAL: could not create any TCP/IP sockets Apparently, access to IPv4 sockets isn't working either (and the "No error" isn't very helpful; would seem we're not reading the right status value). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: