Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25622.1167262616@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> The problem with that is that "AS foo" already has a meaning, and it's >> not this one. > How about "AS (foo)" ? What if you want to specify an alias? This doesn't work: FROM myverylongfunctionname(...) AS alias(typename) because, again, that syntax already has a meaning. You could possibly do something with a cast: FROM CAST(myfunc(...) AS typename) [ AS alias ] This is at least syntactically OK. Not sure what the implementation issues might be. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: